Steve Neale and Frank Krutnik’s argument : To what extent can this process be seen in Seven Chances (w/Buster Keaton, 1925)? How are the norms of slapstick comedy adapted to the narrative demands of the feature-length format?

Steve Neale and Frank Krutnik’s argument

It is Steve Neale and Frank Krutnik’s argument that the development of the multiple-reel “feature” film led comic filmmakers to experiment with various combinations of slapstick and genteel components (e.g., the narrative-based “situation slapstick” style in the case of Lloyd, sentiment in the case of Chaplin, etc.).

To what extent can this process be seen in Seven Chances (w/Buster Keaton, 1925)? How are the norms of slapstick comedy adapted to the narrative demands of the feature-length format?

Note: This is not a research paper, but a film analysis assignment. Nonetheless, insofar as you will likely need some context in order to situate these movies within screen comedy’s broader development, you may usefully consult the following:

Walter Kerr, The Silent Clowns (1975)
Rob King, The Fun Factory: The Keystone Film Company and the Emergence of Mass Culture (2009)
Robert Knopf, The Theatre and Cinema of Buster Keaton (1999)
Daniel Moews, Keaton: The Silent Features Close Up (1977)