Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace.
This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas.
Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership.
The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation):
Change Implementation and Management Plan
Create a narrated PowerPoint presentation of 5 or 6 slides with video that presents a comprehensive plan to implement the change you propose.
Your narrated presentation should be 5–6 minutes in length.
Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:
An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.)
A description of the change being proposed
Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace
Details about the type and scope of the proposed change
Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change
Identification of a change management team (by title/role)
A plan for communicating the change you propose
A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose
Resources:
Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Chapter 4, “Practice Model Design, Implementation, and Evaluation” (pp. 99–154)
Cullen, L., & Adams, S. L. (2012). Planning for implementation of evidence-based practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(4), 222–230.
Pollack, J., & Pollack, R. (2015). Using Kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organizational change program: Presentation and practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(1), 51-66.
Seijts, G. H., & Gandz, J. (2016). Transformational change and leader character. Business Horizons, 61(2), 239-249.
Tistad, M., Palmcrantz, S., Wallin, L., Ehrenberg, A., Olsson, C. B., Tomson, G., …Eldh, A. C. (2016). Developing leadership in managers to facilitate the implementation of national guideline recommendations: A process evaluation of feasibility and usefulness. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 5(8), 477–486. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.35. Retrieved from http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3183_5015382bcf9183a74ef7e79b0a941f65.pdf
RUBRIC:
Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:
· An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment).
· A description of the changes being proposed.
· Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace.
32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
Presentation provides an accurate and detailed executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace.
Presentation accurately and completely describes in detail the changes being proposed.
Presentation accurately and thoroughly details justifications for the changes, including a thorough and complete explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace.
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
Presentation provides an accurate executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace.
Presentation accurately describes the changes being proposed.
Presentation accurately justifies the changes, including an accurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace.
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
Presentation provides an executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace that is vague or inaccurate.
Presentation describes the changes being proposed that is vague or inaccurate.
Presentation vaguely or inaccurately justifies the changes, including a vague or inaccurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace.
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
Presentation provides an executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting an organization/workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Presentation describes the changes being proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Presentation vaguely and inaccurately justifies the changes, including a vague and inaccurate explanation of why addressing these changes will have a positive impact on the organization/workplace, or is missing.
· Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes.
· Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes.
· Identification of a change management team (by title/role).
· A plan for communicating the changes you propose.
· A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose.
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the changes proposed.
Presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes.
Presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management by title/role that is detailed.
Presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed.
Presentation accurately and thoroughly describes in detail risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Presentation accurately details the type and scope of the changes proposed.
Presentation accurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes.
Presentation accurately identifies a change management by title/role.
Presentation accurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed.
Presentation accurately describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Presentation details the type and scope of the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate.
Presentation identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes that is vague or inaccurate.
Presentation identifies a change management by title/role that is vague or inaccurate.
Presentation proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate.
Presentation describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed that is vague or inaccurate.
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Presentation details the type and scope of the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Presentation identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Presentation identifies a change management by title/role that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Presentation proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Presentation describes risk mitigation plans recommended to address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Include a narrated presentation that is 5–6 minutes in length.
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the presentation. Presentation should be aesthetically organized and easy to follow with an introduction, purpose statement, and conclusion
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Narrated presentation adequately summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the presentation.
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the presentation responses. Audio recording may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the presentation.
0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the presentation or is missing. Audio recording is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the presentation, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6053_Module05_Week11_Assignment_Rubric